Seventh Circuit· 6/16/2010

Judge v. Quinn

Citations

612 F.3d 537
68 A.L.R. 6th 765
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12353
2010 WL 2652204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “[wjhere a plaintiffs voting rights are curtailed, the injury is sufficiently concrete to count as an ‘injury in fact’”
explaining that “perfunctory and undeveloped arguments * * * are waived” (citation omitted)
explaining that “perfunctory and undeveloped arguments *** are waived” (citation omitted)
according voters standing to challenge Illinois Governor's failure to call a special election to fill vacant Illinois U.S. Senate seat, since alleged curtailment of the plaintiffs' voting rights was \sufficiently concrete to count as an 'injury in fact'\
“The district court [is] under no obligation to entertain” arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief
“[P]erfunctory and underdeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovner, Wood, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Judge v. Quinn

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.