· 6/29/2011
Jtekt Corp. v. United States
Citations
- 642 F.3d 1378
- 33 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1170
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13252
- 2011 WL 2557640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Commerce must explain why these (or other) differences between the two phases make it reasonable to continue zeroing in one phase, but not the other.”
- “In order to satisfy the requirement set out in Dongbu, Commerce must explain why ... [it is] reasonable to continue zeroing in one phase, but not the other.”
- “While Commerce did point to differences between investigations and administrative reviews, it failed to address the relevant question— why is it a reasonable interpretation of the statute to zero in administrative reviews, but not in investigations?”
- “While Commerce did point to differences between investigations and ad- ministrative reviews, it failed to address the relevant question—why is it a reasonable interpretation of the statute to zero in administrative reviews, but not in investigations?”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dyk, Moore, O'Malley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.