Skip to main content
· 6/29/2011

Jtekt Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 642 F.3d 1378
  • 33 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1170
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13252
  • 2011 WL 2557640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Commerce must explain why these (or other) differences between the two phases make it reasonable to continue zeroing in one phase, but not the other.”
  • “In order to satisfy the requirement set out in Dongbu, Commerce must explain why ... [it is] reasonable to continue zeroing in one phase, but not the other.”
  • “While Commerce did point to differences between investigations and administrative reviews, it failed to address the relevant question— why is it a reasonable interpretation of the statute to zero in administrative reviews, but not in investigations?”
  • “While Commerce did point to differences between investigations and ad- ministrative reviews, it failed to address the relevant question—why is it a reasonable interpretation of the statute to zero in administrative reviews, but not in investigations?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dyk, Moore, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.