Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 12/14/2007

Nsk Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 510 F.3d 1375
  • 29 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1867
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28917
  • 2007 WL 4357773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Commerce’s public recommendation to change its methodology was not a final decision where it “has not yet abandoned its previous methodology or adopted a new one”
  • stating that “Commerce’s zeroing practice is in accordance with our well-established precedent.”
  • stating that “Commerce’s zeroing practice is in accordance with our well-established precedent.”
  • affirming the dismissal of a claim as unripe solely because the agency action was not final, without discussing hardship to the claimant
  • “Generally, an agency decision is not ripe for judicial review until the allegedly offending agency has adopted a final decision.”
  • “[A]n agency decision is not ripe for judicial review until the allegedly offending agency has adopted a final decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Dyk, and Prost, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.