Joyce v. Joyce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the father's contractual obligation to pay his children's college expenses was \most logically characterized as a form of child support\ based on an interpretation of the parties' marital settlement agreement
• holding alimony provision was intended as support rather than property distribution where it was in a separate section and did not indicate exchange of property interests for payments
• holding alimony provision was intended as support rather than property distribution where it was in a separate section and did not indicate exchange of property interests for payments
• stating that \pure property settlement agreements are nonmodifiable absent consent of the parties\
• stating that \pure property settlement agreements are nonmodifiable absent consent of the parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pipitone v. Pipitone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-28· cited 13×
• Pullo v. Pullo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-13· cited 12×
• Robinson v. Robinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-07· cited 7×
• Carlton v. Carlton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 6×
• Ganzel v. Ganzel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-08· cited 5×
• Pratt v. Pratt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-26· cited 1×
• Hall v. Hall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martinez v. Martinez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-27· cited 17×
• Cannon v. Morris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-18· cited 16×
• Brown v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-26· cited 16×
• Petty v. Petty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-06· cited 13×