District of Columbia· 11/14/1990
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Manbeck
Citations
- 751 F. Supp. 225
- 17 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1257
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15334
- 1990 WL 188727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence of skepticism directed to economic and commercial factors, as opposed to technical merit, does not carry substantial weight
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Harry F. Manbeck, Jr., Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksFederal Circuit· 1992-03-20· cited 16×
- Teles Ag v. KapposDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-05· cited 3×
- Dome Patent, L.P. v. ReaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-01· cited 3×
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. KapposDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-18· cited 2×
- Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, LLCE.D. Wisconsin· 2012-09-29· cited 2×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationFederal Circuit· 1983-07-25· cited 538×
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-07-29· cited 421×
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1983-11-14· cited 366×
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1988-06-15· cited 281×
- Environmental Designs, Ltd. And the Trentham Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California and Ralph M. Parsons Co.Federal Circuit· 1983-07-25· cited 226×
- Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Federal Circuit· 1985-08-09· cited 176×
- Demaco Corporation v. F. Von Langsdorff Licensing Limited and F. Von Langsdorff Bauverfahren GmbhFederal Circuit· 1988-06-21· cited 157×
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1985-10-25· cited 130×
- In Re Yujiro Yamamoto, and Dictaphone Corp., IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1984-08-07· cited 112×
- Roger Sjolund v. Peter K. Musland, Norsol, Inc., and Wink CorporationFederal Circuit· 1988-06-01· cited 90×
- In re KellerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-02-12· cited 63×
- Pentec, Inc., and Bob Allen v. Graphic Controls Corp.Federal Circuit· 1985-11-01· cited 49×
- In Re Robert C. Sneed and Joseph C. Young, and E-Z Lay Pipe Corp. And Stream Line, Inc., IntervenorsFederal Circuit· 1983-06-27· cited 29×
- In Re Vamco MacHine and Tool, IncFederal Circuit· 1985-01-17· cited 28×
- Burlington Industries, Inc., John D. Neefus, and Frederick M. Shofner v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksFederal Circuit· 1987-07-15· cited 28×
- Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-10-07· cited 25×
- In Re Robert K. Grasselli and Harley F. Hardman, and Rohm and Haas Company, IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1983-07-15· cited 20×
- In re LindnerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1972-04-06· cited 20×
- Letcher T. White v. Jeffrey Mining MacHinery Company, Jeffrey Galion, Inc., and Dresser Industries, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1983-12-07· cited 18×
Other cases named Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Manbeck
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.