Skip to main content
· 1/17/1985

In Re Vamco MacHine and Tool, Inc

Citations

  • 752 F.2d 1564
  • 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 617
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting appellant’s evidence of secondary considerations and finding that the features claimed in the patent had no connection to the features of the device that resulted in commercial success and satisfied a felt need in the industry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Nichols, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.