Joseph v. Carnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an injunction preventing the destruction of evidence was unnecessary given the duty to preserve evidence
• “The SCA provides that a successful plaintiff may recover ‘actual damages suffered by the plaintiff and any profits made by the violator as a result of the violation’ as well as ‘punitive damages’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 944×
• Rhonda Ezell v. City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-07-06· cited 494×
• Ty, Inc. v. The Jones Group, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-01-23· cited 381×
• Richard Worthington, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Dave Wilson and Jeff Wall, and Village of Peoria Heights, Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-11-12· cited 137×
• Trask-Morton v. Motel 6 Operating L.P.
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-07-17· cited 122×
• Stuller, Inc. v. Steak N Shake Enterprises, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-08-24· cited 94×
• Northeastern Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Wabash Valley Power Ass'n
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 88×
• Derek Redmond v. Mary Redmond
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-07-25· cited 71×
• Zulfigar Qureshi v. Alberto R. Gonzales
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 55×
• MacNeil Automotive Products, Ltd. v. Cannon Automotive Ltd.
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-05-25· cited 29×
• United States v. Banas
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 25×
• Randell L.D. Smith v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-06-12· cited 21×