Ty, Inc. v. The Jones Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a likelihood of confusion was sufficiently pleaded at the Rule 12(b)(6
• holding that the magistrate judge did not err in placing greater weight on the similarity of marks, the similarity of products, and the area and manner of concurrent use
• holding that the area of concurrent use overlapped when the parties sold their products in the same stores, advertised in the same magazines, and targeted the same general audience
• holding that the area of concurrent use overlapped when the parties sold their products in the same stores, advertised in the same magazines, and targeted the same general audience
• noting that a court should \exclude[ ]\ the burden a defendant \voluntarily assume[s] by proceeding in the face of a known risk\
• noting that a court should \exclude[]\ the burden a defendant \voluntarily assume[s] by proceeding in the face of a known risk\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).