Skip to main content
· 3/12/1965

Joseph Daniel Holt v. United States

Citations

  • 342 F.2d 163
  • 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exculpatory evidence should be “of substantial probative value” and not “prejudice or confuse”
  • evidence should be of “substantial probative value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuttle, Moore, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.