Joseph Bernal v. NRA Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a percentage-based collection fee is a permissible cost that does not require the obligation to exist prior to billing
• explaining that past participles can either “refer[] to a completed event” or “describe[] the present state of the nouns they modify,” depending on context (citing Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1718, 1722 (2017
• contract authorized collection of “any amounts” due and “any costs” incurred; court concluded that “absent limiting language, ‘any’ should mean ‘any’”
• contract authorized collection of “any amounts” due and “any costs” incurred; court concluded that “absent limiting language, ‘any’ should mean ‘any’”
• contract authorized collection of “any amounts” due and “any costs” incurred; court concluded that “absent limiting language, ‘any’ should mean ‘any’”
• contract authorized collection of “any amounts” due and “any costs” incurred; court concluded that “absent limiting language, ‘any’ should mean ‘any’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Joseph Bernal v. NRA Group, LLC

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Joseph Bernal v. NRA Group, LLC
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-07-19