· 1/2/2014
Dianne Roden Bradley v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
Citations
- 739 F.3d 606
- 2014 WL 23738
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a debt collector violated Section 1692f(1
- “Because there was no express agreement between Urology and Bradley allowing for collection of the 33-and-1/3% fee, that fee violates the FDCPA.”
- explaining the related present-perfect and future-perfect tenses
- explaining the related present-perfect and future-perfect tenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hull, Marcus, Per Curiam, Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.