Jose Eduardo Arredondo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Miller Court “did not hold that discretionary life without parole sentences violate the Eighth Amendment”
• finding that the Miller Court “did not hold that discretionary life without parole sentences violate the Eighth Amendment”
• stating that “Courts must apply penal statutes exactly as they read.”
• ‘‘Miller prevented the mandatory imposition of life without parole for juvenile offenders, but specifically allowed a discretionary sen- tence of life without parole when the circumstances justify it’’ [emphasis omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).