Jordan v. Pugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding facial vagueness and First Amendment overbreadth challenge to same statute were one claim
• requiring the court to resolve all pending issues on a claim before entering a Rule 54(b) order
• explaining a Rule 54(b) order is final only when “it is an ultimate disposition of an individual claim”
• explaining a Rule 54(b) order is final only when “it is an ultimate disposition of an individual claim”
• requiring the court to resolve all pending issues on a claim before entering a Rule 54(b) order
• “Overbreadth and vagueness may overlap when the challenged statute is so unclear in its scope that officials enforce it in an overbroad manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).