U.S. Citizens Association v. Kathleen Sebeliux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an individual’s relationship with his health insurance company “do[es] not qualify as [an] intimate association[] warranting constitutional protection”
• alternative theories challenging constitutionality of statute as violating free expression and association, right to liberty, and right to privacy in medical information were separate from commerce clause theory for Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).