Jordan v. Hamada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a determination of a question of law made by an appellate court in the course of an action becomes ‘the law of the case’ and may not be disputed by a reopening of the question at a later stage of litigation” (citation and block quote format omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Buch
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-10-09· cited 71×
• Wong v. City and County of Honolulu
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 60×
• Gillan v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-10-29· cited 48×
• Kepo'o v. Kane
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-01-04· cited 30×
• Moss v. American International Adjustment Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-10-29· cited 24×
• Union City Associates v. City of Union City
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-04-27· cited 24×
• Labayog v. Labayog
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-12-10· cited 15×
• Jordan v. Hamada
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-04-02· cited 12×
• Dosland v. Dosland
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1984-03-14· cited 5×
• State v. Gomes
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-03-23· cited 4×
• Public Service Commission v. Southwest Gas Corp.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1987-06-25