· 5/23/1983
Wong v. City and County of Honolulu
Citations
- 665 P.2d 157
- 66 Haw. 389
- 1983 Haw. LEXIS 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that \`law of the case' ... refers to the usual practice of courts to refuse to disturb all prior rulings in a particular case\ (citations omitted)
- applying the abuse of discretion standard to HRCP Rule 37 sanctions
- \[T]he doctrine of `law of the case' . . . refers to the usual practice of courts to refuse to disturb all prior rulings in a particular case[.]\
- “Unless cogent reasons support the second court’s action, any modification of a prior ruling of another court of equal and concurrent jurisdiction will be deemed an abuse of discretion.”
- applying the abuse of discretion standard to sanctions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Kanbara
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.