Skip to main content
· 5/23/1983

Wong v. City and County of Honolulu

Citations

  • 665 P.2d 157
  • 66 Haw. 389
  • 1983 Haw. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \`law of the case' ... refers to the usual practice of courts to refuse to disturb all prior rulings in a particular case\ (citations omitted)
  • applying the abuse of discretion standard to HRCP Rule 37 sanctions
  • \[T]he doctrine of `law of the case' . . . refers to the usual practice of courts to refuse to disturb all prior rulings in a particular case[.]\
  • “Unless cogent reasons support the second court’s action, any modification of a prior ruling of another court of equal and concurrent jurisdiction will be deemed an abuse of discretion.”
  • applying the abuse of discretion standard to sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Kanbara

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.