Jones v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having specified a particular purpose for the offer, Jones is not in a position to now claim error because the evidence might have been admissible on other grounds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moreau v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-12-15· cited 92×
• State v. Palin
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-12-28· cited 59×
• Johnson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-09-19· cited 57×
• Stanford v. Iowa State Reformatory
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1979-05-30· cited 40×
• Shane v. Rhines
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 33×
• Dyer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-07-01· cited 33×
• State v. Manini
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-06-06· cited 24×
• Smithart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-10-31· cited 19×
• State v. Mata
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-02-28· cited 19×
• Murdock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-05-27· cited 15×
• Worthy v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 13×
• Hughes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-10-17· cited 13×
• State v. Gabrielson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-10-24· cited 11×
• Taylor v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-09-21· cited 4×
• Linscott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-05-18· cited 1×