Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 515 S.W.2d 126
  • 1974 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding hearsay inadmissible under state of mind exception because statement did not reflect intent or motive for future action, but only discussed preceding events
  • holding hearsay inadmissible under state of mind exception because statement did not reflect intent or motive for future action, but only discussed preceding events
  • holding hearsay inadmissible under state of mind exception because statement did not reflect intent or motive for future action, but only discussed preceding events
  • holding hearsay inadmissible under state of mind exception because statement did not reflect intent or motive for future action, but only discussed preceding events
  • out-of-court statement by murder victim, defendant's husband, three years before killing that he believed defendant was unfaithful to him was inadmissible to show deceased's state ofmind and was prejudicial error
  • out-of-court statement by murder victim, defendant’s husband, three years before killing that he believed defendant was unfaithful to him was inadmissible to show deceased’s state of mind and was prejudicial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.