Skip to main content

Fortson v. State

Citations

  • 629 S.E.2d 798
  • 280 Ga. 435
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1358
  • 2006 Ga. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel was not deficient in not calling a witness who was “not credible” and would have offered “counter-productive” testimony
  • concluding that the defendant did not show deficient performance where his trial counsel did not call an alleged alibi witness due to concerns about her credibility
  • where witness not credible and production of witness would be counter-productive, trial counsel’s decision not to call witness is strategic
  • “In ruling on an ineffectiveness claim, this Court need not analyze the deficient performance prong if the Court determines the prejudice prong has not been satisfied.”
  • when ruling on ineffective assistance claim, we need not analyze the deficient performance prong if we determine the prejudice prong has not been satisfied
  • when ruling on ineffective assistance claim, we need not analyze the deficient performance prong if we determine the prejudice prong has not been satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.