Jones v. Livingston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow expert to testify on a subject not timely revealed to plaintiffs.
• “The trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow defendants’ expert to testify concerning a subject matter not revealed to plaintiffs.”
• exclusion of accident reconstruction expert’s testimony on effect of failure to use seat belt not abuse of discretion
• where plaintiffs made a discovery request that defendants state the subject matter about which their expert would testify, trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow expert to testify on a subject not revealed to plaintiffs
• where plaintiffs made a discovery request that defendants state the subject matter about which their expert would testify, trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow expert to testify on a subject not revealed to plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).