Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/22/1914

Jones v. Jones

Citations

  • 234 U.S. 615
  • 34 S. Ct. 937
  • 58 L. Ed. 1500
  • 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1113

Syllabus

<p>The statute of Tennessee of 1865, c. 40, § 8, declaring that children of slave marriages should be legitimately entitled to inherit, as it has been construed by the highest court of that State as not extending the right of inheritance beyond lineal descendants of the parents, is not unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.</p> <p>Inheritance is not a natural or absolute right but the creation of statute and is governed by the lex rei sitce.</p> <p>The rights of one claiming real property as heir, through an alien, a bastard or a slave, must be determined by the local law. Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333.</p> <p>While a colored freedman in Tennessee could dispose of property acquired during freedom by deed or will and it descended to his issue, if any, if he died intestate, if no issue survived, it passed under the terms of the act of 1865 to his widow, if she survived, and not to his collateral relatives.</p>

Judges: Lurton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.