Jones v. Jones
Citations
- 51 La. Ann. 636
- 25 So. 368
- 1898 La. LEXIS 591
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The familiar rule of evidence that parol testimony is inadmissible to affect, alter, or change title to immovable property is given interesting application herein.</p> <p>2. Likewise the rule of law relating to the prescription of tax titles and acta of sale translative of property, and relating .to estoppels by conduct as affecting minors after becoming of. age.</p> <p>3. Any creditor having an interest that prescription should be acquired by his debtor may plead it.</p>
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Franklin v. SewallSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1903-03-30· cited 18×
- Cox v. Lea's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1902-11-17· cited 13×
- Bradford-Kennedy Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1922-06-23· cited 10×
- Douglass v. DouglassSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1899-06-19· cited 10×
- Ernest M. Loeb Co. v. Avoyelles Drainage Dist. No. 8W.D. Louisiana· 1945-05-02· cited 5×
- Castleman v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1924-01-07· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barrow v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1887-04-15· cited 14×
- Larthet v. HoganSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1846-11-15· cited 9×
- Pagett v. CurtisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1860-07-15· cited 8×
- Carter v. McManusSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1860-12-15· cited 7×
- Bland v. LloydSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1872-12-15· cited 6×
- Giddens v. MobleySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1885-12-15· cited 2×
- Lake Roland Elevated Railway Co. v. Hibernian SocietyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1896-06-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.