Jones v. Jones
Citations
- 38 Cal. 584
Syllabus
<p>Pleading—Counter Claim—Cross-Complaint.—An answer which asserts a set-off, or counter claim, is not a cross-complaint within the meaning of tlio Practice Act, and no denial thereof, by the plaintiff, is required.</p> <p>Kirw Trial Claimed on the Ground of Newly Discovered Evidence.—Newly discovered evidence, which is only cumulative, furnishes no ground for a new trial.</p> <p>Promissory Note—Revenue Stamp.—The admission in writing of a balance duo upon an accounting, not signed by the defendant, is not a promissory note, and needs no stamp under the provisions of the revenue laws.</p> <p>Admissibility of Secondary Evidence.—Secondary evidence of the contents of a written instrument may be given, when the party offering it is not entitled to the custody of tho original, and the opposite party, to whoso custody it rightfully belongs, upon being notified to produce it, disclaims all knowledge of it.</p>
Judges: Crockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kessinger v. Organic Fertilizers, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1957-06-18· cited 17×
- Estate of ClausseniusCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-03-24· cited 14×
- Press Publishing Co. v. Reading News AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-11-21· cited 11×
- Delannoy v. BlondetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1915-03-31· cited 9×
- Silveyra v. HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-12-09· cited 4×
- Collazo v. Juncos Central Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1910-03-07
- People v. EspañolSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1910-03-30
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.