Jones v. Goodson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• social security benefits deposited in checking account are exempt from process
• “In this case, it is undisputed that Jones’s social security benefits were on deposit in his checking account, were 7 The overpayment notice together with Moment’s testimony suggest Moment’s benefits were supplemental security income disability benefits. Although section 407(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• S & S Diversified Services, L.L.C. v. Taylor
  D. Wyoming· 1995-06-23· cited 40×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-04-23· cited 30×
• in the Matter of the Marriage of Melissa Lea Gunn Everse and Johannes Everse
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2013-06-18· cited 9×
• In Re Frazier
  W.D. Arkansas· 1991-10-08
• State of Iowa v. Yoosuf Moment
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2021-03-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board
  Supreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 411×
• Rose v. Rose
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 321×
• Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-11· cited 151×
• Bennett v. Arkansas
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-29· cited 128×
• Trotter v. Tennessee
  Supreme Court· 1933-12-04· cited 107×
• Lawrence v. Shaw
  Supreme Court· 1937-03-01· cited 94×
• Carrier v. Bryant
  Supreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 52×
• Fayette County Hospital v. Reavis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-12· cited 23×
• Malakul v. Altech Arkansas, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-03-13· cited 16×