Jones v. Fife

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• new enactments “do not alter a substantive law governing Jones’ offense or shorten his sentence” (emphasis added
• “retroactive application of [sections 559.115.7 and 217.362.5] do not alter a substantive law governing Jones’ offense or shorten his sen- tence” and “would only result in a potential change of location or circumstances under which Jones serves the remainder of his sentence”
• construing sections 559.115.7 and 217.362.5 RSMo Cum.Supp.2004
• sections 559.115.7 and 217.362.5, RSMo Cum.Supp.2004

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).