Skip to main content

Jones v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 650 S.E.2d 859
  • 50 Va. App. 437
  • 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failing to assert a fact when it would have been natural to do so qualifies as a prior inconsistent statement permitting impeachment
  • noting that “post-trial motions regarding [the] admission of evidence generally are not timely” but holding that the defendant raised the admissibility issue adequately at trial to preserve his argument for appeal under Rule 5A:18
  • “[I]t is the province of the jury . . . to weigh the facts and to judge the credibility of the various witnesses.” (alterations in original) (quoting Ford v. Commonwealth, 48 Va. App. 262, 268 (2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.