Johnston v. Lanter
Citations
- 87 Kan. 32
- 123 P. 719
- 1912 Kan. LEXIS 82
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Sales — Warranty—Inspection of Goods — Laches. A sale of goods, in which a quality thereof is described, implies a warranty that the goods are of the quality described, provided the purchaser has had no prior opportunity to inspect them, but relies upon the description thereof.</p> <p>2. --- Same. There is no rule of law applicable to all cases by which it can be determined whether a purchaser, on delivery to him of goods bought without inspection but on warranty, has unreasonably delayed discovering and reporting to the seller a defect. The apparent or concealed nature of the defect and all the circumstances of each particular case should be considered and the conclusion of fact should be submitted to the jury under proper instructions.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Naaf v. GriffittsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-04-06· cited 18×
- Balthazor v. B & B Boiler & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1950-05-06· cited 9×
- Burgner-Bowman Lumber Co. v. McCord-Kistler Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1923-01-06· cited 9×
- Martin v. A. L. Scott Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1929-01-12· cited 6×
- Weede v. BannonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1954-01-23· cited 5×
- Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-05-06· cited 5×
- S. F. Bowser & Co. v. BathurstSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-02-07· cited 4×
- Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. MollSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-05-08· cited 4×
- Grainger Bros. v. G. Amsinck & Co.Eighth Circuit· 1926-10-13· cited 2×
- Palm, Fechteler & Co. v. Uncle Sam Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1916-04-08
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.