Johnson v. Washington County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though the child was in the water alone, the general trespasser standard of section 335 was applicable because the child was under the supervision of adults
• “Evidentiary rulings concerning . . . relevancy . . . are within the [district] court’s sound discretion and will only be reversed when that discretion has been clearly abused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).