District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/11/1991
Johnson v. United States
Citations
- 596 A.2d 980
- 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 248
- 1991 WL 178234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ―An appellant does not suffer [manifest] prejudice merely because a significant portion of the government‘s evidence admitted at trial is applicable only to his codefendants.‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steadman, Schwelb, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-17· cited 210×
- Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-01-28· cited 96×
- Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 46×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-05-13· cited 45×
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 36×
- Elliott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-04· cited 32×
- King v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-01-15· cited 24×
- Poole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-26· cited 22×
- Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-09-29· cited 22×
- Hargraves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-03-07· cited 20×
- Omar v. Rollerson & Rolita N. Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-12-17· cited 17×
- Sweet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-05-25· cited 16×
- McCray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-03-10· cited 14×
- Reaves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-08· cited 13×
- United States v. GrayDistrict of Columbia· 2003-11-19· cited 9×
- MARCELLUS MCCRAY, LAMONTE HENSON, ANTONIO FORTSON, AND TIMOTHY PARKER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-03-10
- Hargraves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-01-17
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Wyoming Community Development Authority v. DurningSupreme Court· 1987-11-09· cited 165×
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-28· cited 150×
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-10-31· cited 107×
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-15· cited 76×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-05-31· cited 64×
- Willcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-09-19· cited 63×
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-26· cited 59×
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-01-07· cited 55×
- United States v. Robert L. MacK United States of America v. Harold L. JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 1972-10-24· cited 54×
- Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-28· cited 54×
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-16· cited 52×
- German v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-05-07· cited 50×
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-08-18· cited 42×
- Roper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-26· cited 40×
- Groves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-19· cited 39×
- Holmes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-10· cited 37×
- Brewer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-31· cited 33×
- Bigelow v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-09-04· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.