Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/14/1968
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 238 A.2d 286
- 3 Md. App. 105
- 1968 Md. App. LEXIS 543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it is impermissible to attack a witness’s credibility by asking about juvenile records directly, because juvenile proceedings are not admissible
- noting that it is impermissible to attack a witness’s credibility by asking about juvenile records directly, because juvenile proceedings are not admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roger Fain v. Ed Duff, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1974-03-01· cited 79×
- Vuitch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-11-24· cited 44×
- Avery v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-30· cited 34×
- Hazell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-06-02· cited 30×
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-01· cited 25×
- Matter of AndersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-02-11· cited 22×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-12· cited 16×
- Kyle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-02-19· cited 13×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-12· cited 12×
- Pinkett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-02· cited 12×
- Hallengren v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-01-19· cited 10×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-15· cited 9×
- Matter of AlexanderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-12-07· cited 5×
- AdmissionsCriminal History – Whether Higher Education Institutions May Rescind a Student's Admission on the Basis of Criminal History Discovered After Enrollment – Whether the Maryland Fair Access to Education Act Applies to Juvenile RecordsMaryland Attorney General Reports· 2021-02-23
- AdmissionsCriminal History – Whether Higher Education Institutions May Rescind a Student's Admission on the Basis of Criminal History Discovered After Enrollment – Whether the Maryland Fair Access to Education Act Applies to Juvenile RecordsMaryland Attorney General Reports· 2021-03-23
- Vernon v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-09-28
- Gardner v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-04-05
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 106OAG003Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2021-02-18
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-01-24· cited 88×
- Bean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-04-28· cited 71×
- Moquin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-05-02· cited 61×
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-10-16· cited 43×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-07-05· cited 42×
- State v. HanceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-09-29· cited 40×
- Westfall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-07-19· cited 28×
- Gray v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-12-16· cited 28×
- Dortch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-18· cited 18×
- Braun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-11-21· cited 18×
- Crum v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-03-31· cited 14×
- Whitmer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-03-31· cited 13×
- McCoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-11-13· cited 12×
- Rice v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-03-12· cited 12×
- Hammer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.