Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 151 S.W.3d 193
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2116
  • 2004 WL 2808878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court reporter’s notes and records can be considered “lost” only if the missing portions of the appellate record are irretrievable
  • holding that court reporter’s notes are lost for purposes of Rule 34.6 when the missing portions of the record are irretrievable
  • holding that a court reporter's notes and records, or portions thereof, can be considered “lost” only if the missing portions of the appellate record are irretrievable
  • holding that court reporter’s notes and records, or portions thereof, can only be considered lost if missing portions of record are irretrievable and may not be considered lost based solely on reporter’s repeated failure to file record
  • holding that court reporter’s notes and records, or portions thereof, can only be considered lost if missing portions of record are 6 irretrievable and may not be considered lost based solely on reporter’s repeated failure to file record
  • holding that court reporter’s notes and records, or portions thereof, can only be considered lost if missing portions of record are 5 irretrievable and may not be considered lost based solely on reporter’s repeated failure to file record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.