Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 942 P.2d 167
  • 113 Nev. 772
  • 1997 Nev. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this court will accept a district court's findings when based on evidence appellant did not include in the record on appeal
  • explaining that matters not appearing in the appellate record cannot be properly considered and that it is the defendant's responsibility to develop that record for appeal
  • \It is appellant's responsibility to make an adequate appellate record. We cannot properly consider matters not appearing in that record.\ (citation omitted)
  • \It is appellant's responsibility to make an adequate appellate record. We cannot properly consider matters not appearing in that record.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Rose, Young, Maupin, Springer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.