IN RE: APPLICATION OF SMITH (BRECK)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Golding review was not available for petitioner’s claim that sentencing court violated his due process and equal protection rights because petitioner failed to raise those claims in habeas court
• reviewing court does not consider claims not raised in habeas court
• bypass under test set forth in State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70, 327 A.2d 576 (1973), as reformulated in Golding, was inappropriate in habeas proceeding when habeas court did not rule on or decide claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).