Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 642 S.E.2d 170
  • 283 Ga. App. 524
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 449
  • 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under Rouse, “[t]he decision whether to grant a motion to withdraw representation falls within the sound discretion of the trial court”
  • “the ultimate decision over whether to move for a mistrial is a strategic one made by the lawyer, not the client”
  • \[C]ounsel's decision whether to move for a mistrial generally falls within the ambit of trial strategy.\
  • “[C]ounsel’s decision whether to move for a mistrial generally falls within the ambit of trial strategy.”
  • disagreement between defense counsel and appellant “causing tension in their relationship” did not require grant of counsel’s motion to withdraw on basis that appellant “was angry” and “had lost confidence in him”
  • “[T]he failure to transcribe limited portions of the trial 6 proceedings does not constitute reversible error, if the defendant fails to show how he was harmed or to raise any issue which this Court is unable to adequately review because of skips in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernes, Barnes, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.