Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [Tolling Statute] was obviously intended to prevent a person from losing the opportunity to bring a claim where circumstances precluded either proper notice or a realistic effort to pursue the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Julian v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-08-04· cited 33×
• Sulzen v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-11· cited 15×
• Zilleruelo v. Commodity Transporters
  Utah Supreme Court· 2022-01-20· cited 13×
• Bonneville Asphalt v. Labor Commission
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2004-04-29· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Myers v. McDonald
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-08-11· cited 113×
• State v. Johnson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-05-19· cited 75×
• Hurst v. Cook
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-06-30· cited 74×
• Warren v. Provo City Corp.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1992-09-23· cited 62×
• Fernandez v. Cook
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-11-16· cited 52×
• Renn v. Utah State Board of Pardons
  Utah Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 50×
• Andrews v. Morris
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 46×
• Smith v. Cook
  Utah Supreme Court· 1990-11-29· cited 44×
• Currier v. Holden
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-09-17· cited 27×
• Jensen v. DeLand
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-12-29· cited 16×
• Gerrish v. Barnes
  Utah Supreme Court· 1992-12-16· cited 12×