Tenth Circuit· 10/29/1990
Johnson v. Rogers
Citations
- 917 F.2d 1283
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a crowded docket, without more, is insufficient to justify lengthy delay
- holding that mandamus relief was appropriate after a delay of fourteen months due only to docket congestion
- holding that mandamus relief was appropriate after a delay of fourteen months due only to docket congestion
- holding that, after a delay of fourteen months due only to docket congestion, “petitioner has established a clear and indisputable right to have his petition expeditiously heard and decided, and [] has no alternative remedy”
- granting writ of mandamus where district court failed to rule on a petition for writ of habeas which had been pending for fourteen months
- “[W]rits of habeas corpus are intended to afford a ‘swift and imperative 29 remedy in all cases of illegal restraint or confinement.’” (quoting Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 400 (1963))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hoeun Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionNinth Circuit· 2000-04-11· cited 196×
- United States v. DagoTenth Circuit· 2006-03-30· cited 79×
- Yue Yu v. BrownD. New Mexico· 1999-01-28· cited 77×
- Rios v. ZiglerTenth Circuit· 2005-02-16· cited 76×
- In re: McCarthey v.Tenth Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 62×
- Kell v. BenzonTenth Circuit· 2019-05-28· cited 15×
- Henry Ford Ballard v. Michael Burrage, District Judge, Rita Maxwell, Real Party in InterestTenth Circuit· 1996-08-21· cited 6×
- Richmond v. Wampanoag Tribal Court CasesD. Utah· 2006-04-21· cited 2×
- Dekovic v. RubioTenth Circuit· 2026-03-10
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 4,814×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-11-17· cited 1,679×
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 1,359×
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,120×
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court· 1976-01-21· cited 1,066×
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 999×
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 664×
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 472×
- Unnamed caseTenth Circuit· 1983-12-22· cited 159×
- Francis T. Glynn v. Robert Donnelly, John M. Farrell v. Robert DonnellyFirst Circuit· 1972-12-12· cited 103×
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeNinth Circuit· 1982-01-07· cited 93×
- United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, United States v. Daniel G. Landry, United States v. Otis Elevator Company and Daniel G. LandryTenth Circuit· 1985-12-03· cited 60×
- Johnson v. RogersTenth Circuit· 1990-10-29· cited 51×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. A. L. ScholesTenth Circuit· 1979-07-24· cited 50×
- Odis R. Van Buskirk v. Fred T. Wilkinson, as Warden of the United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, WashingtonNinth Circuit· 1954-11-08· cited 47×
- Doyle A. Jones v. The Honorable Terry L. Shell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of ArkansasEighth Circuit· 1978-04-06· cited 39×
- Walter L. McClellan v. Don J. Young, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of OhioSixth Circuit· 1970-02-13· cited 19×
- Ruby v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1965-02-12· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.