Skip to main content
· 9/26/2002

Johnson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 828 So. 2d 1021
  • 2002 WL 31119095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that coverage issues are to be “judicially determined by the court” and are “not subject to a determination by appraisers”
  • holding that “causation is … an amount-of-loss question for the appraisal panel when an insurer admits that there is covered loss, the amount of which is disputed.”
  • holding that “causation is … an amount-of-loss question for the appraisal panel when an insurer admits that there is covered loss, the amount of which is disputed.”
  • concluding that “causation is a coverage question for the court when an insurer wholly denies that there is a covered loss and an amount-of-loss question for the appraisal panel when an insurer admits that there is covered loss, the amount of which is disputed”
  • “[C]overage issues [a]re to be judicially determined by the court . . . .”
  • “[W]hen the insurer admits that there is a covered loss, but there is a disagreement on the amount of loss, it is for the appraisers to arrive at the amount to be paid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.