Sunshine State Insurance Co. v. Corridori

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether insureds’ compliance with the policy was sufficient is a dispute of fact
• confirming that where an insured cooperates to some degree or explains non-compliance with a policy’s post-loss requirements, a fact question is presented which should be resolved on an evidentiary hearing
• involving an original claim and a “supplemental claim” filed two years after the original claim was paid and closed
• stating the view of Florida’s Fourth District that coverage issues must be decided before appraisal
• “[W]here the insured cooperates to some degree or provides an explanation for its noncompliance, a fact question is presented regarding the necessity or sufficiency of compliance.”
• “[W]here the insured cooperates to some degree or provides an explanation for its noncompliance, a fact question is presented regarding the necessity or sufficiency of compliance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).