Johnson v. Mortham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he mere administrative inconvenience the Florida Legislature and Florida elections officials will face in redistricting simply cannot justify denial of Plaintiffs' fundamental rights.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Larios v. Cox
  N.D. Georgia· 2004-02-20· cited 13×
• Personhuballah v. Alcorn
  E.D. Virginia· 2016-01-07· cited 10×
• Personhuballah v. Alcorn
  E.D. Virginia· 2017-03-03· cited 5×
• Common Cause v. Rucho
  M.D. North Carolina· 2018-01-16· cited 3×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baker v. Carr
  Supreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
• Goldberg v. Kelly
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
• Elrod v. Burns
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 4,553×
• Reynolds v. Sims
  Supreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
• Hilton v. Braunskill
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 1,809×
• Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 1,402×
• Miller v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 626×
• Connor v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 191×
• School District of Ladue v. Good News/Good Sports Club
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 53×
• WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. SCOTT Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1971-09-10· cited 48×
• DeGrandy v. Wetherell
  N.D. Florida· 1992-05-29· cited 36×
• Johnson v. Mortham
  N.D. Florida· 1996-06-06· cited 25×
• Shaw v. Hunt
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 12×
• Bush v. Vera
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 9×
• United States v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 4×
• Abrams v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 4×