Supreme Court· 1/10/2000
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 528 U.S. 1089
- 120 S. Ct. 820
- 145 L. Ed. 2d 690
- 68 U.S.L.W. 3431
- 2000 U.S. LEXIS 324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \allegations of prosecutorial misconduct do not warrant reversal of a conviction unless the cumulative effect was such to deprive the defendant of a fair trial\
- finding OUJI-CR 2d 4-73 is constitutional, sufficiently limiting, and self-explanatory
- finding OUJI-CR 2d 4-73 is constitutional, sufficiently limiting, and self-explanatory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-09-26· cited 112×
- Browning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-04-24· cited 89×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-02-22· cited 79×
- Wackerly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-08-11· cited 78×
- Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-03-12· cited 77×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-05-22· cited 61×
- Pickens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-01-24· cited 60×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-12-08· cited 51×
- Alverson v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2010-02-16· cited 33×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-01-07· cited 14×
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-28· cited 10×
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-09-21· cited 5×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-03-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.