Johnson v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We construe the words ‘shall’ and ‘must’ in this provision to impose a mandatory duty upon the trial court that must be performed before ruling.”
• “Section 61.511(2) operates as a due process provision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• KELLY LUNSFORD v. KARA ENGLE and JAKE PHILLIPS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-01-22
• KELLY LUNSFORD v. KARA ENGLE and JAKE PHILLIPS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-01-20
• Loring E. Justice v. Linn Marie Guerrero-Justice
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-05

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Ray v. Pentlicki
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-12· cited 36×
• Hindle v. FUITH
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-23· cited 24×
• Vollmer v. Key Development Properties, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-19· cited 21×
• Busch v. Busch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-12· cited 8×
• KI v. Department of Children and Families
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-05· cited 7×
• Poliandro v. Springer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06· cited 5×
• Masiello v. Masiello
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-25· cited 3×