Ray v. Pentlicki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that URESA creates no duty of support but simply provides a means of enforcing a duty of support as that duty may exist under the law of the responding state
• finding no harm from support determinations by separate courts as long as the respondent is not required to make duplicate payments
• father’s duty of support was “circumscribed” by order suspending payments entered by divorce court, regardless of propriety of that order
• father's duty of support was \circumscribed\ by order suspending payments entered by divorce court, regardless of propriety of that order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).