Utah Supreme Court· 5/22/1998

State v. Thomas

Citations

961 P.2d 299
343 Utah Adv. Rep. 32
1998 Utah LEXIS 32
1998 WL 257312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \bald citations] to authority [without] development of that authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority'\ render a brief inadequate
holding that the issuance of a search warrant constituted a core judicial function
stating that Rule 24(a)(9) \requires not just bald citation to authority but development of that authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority\
explaining that \failure to cite to pertinent authority may not always render an issue inadequately briefed\
stating that Rule 24(a)(9) “requires not just bald citation to authority but development of that authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority”
explaining that an adequately,briefed argument must include development of legal authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Howe, RUSSON's, Russon, Stewart, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

153 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.