Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/30/1992
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 425 S.E.2d 46
- 310 S.C. 44
- 1992 S.C. App. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an order entered by consent is binding and conclusive and cannot be attacked by the parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Gardner, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Raby Construction, L.L.P. v. OrrSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 39×
- Lanier v. LanierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 38×
- Saro Investments v. Ocean Holiday PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-02-22· cited 17×
- Real Estate Pros, P.C. v. ByarsWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 4×
- Pocisk v. SEA COAST CONSTRUCTION OF BEAUFORTCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-11-20· cited 2×
- Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
- Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-13
- Richard J. Hook v. SCDHECCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-03-01
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.