Johnson v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Supreme Court has the exclusive responsibility of determining whether its jurisdiction has been properly invoked
• Supreme Court has exclusive responsibility of determining whether its jurisdiction has been properly invoked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. Svaty
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-12-10· cited 95×
• Harsch v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-02-13· cited 93×
• In Re Petition of City of Shawnee for Annexation of Land
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-08-13· cited 49×
• In re the Marriage of Monslow
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-03-08· cited 18×
• Carson v. Eberth
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-03-16· cited 14×
• Weser v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-06-10· cited 8×
• In re the Marriage of Monslow
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-07-28· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taber v. Taber
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-12-08· cited 13×
• Cribbs v. Pacific Intermountain Express
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1972-03-04· cited 6×
• St. Francis Mercantile Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Glenn Walter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-01-20· cited 4×