D. Kansas· 3/6/2000
Johnson v. Gmeinder
Citations
- 191 F.R.D. 638
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2931
- 2000 WL 272347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Party asserting waiver of work-product immunity, rather than the party asserting the work-product protection, should have the burden to establish waiver.
- in contrast to the attorney- client privilege, “a party asserting work-product immunity is not required to prove non-waiver”
- in contrast to the attorney- client privilege, “a party asserting work-product immunity is not required to prove non-waiver”
- in contrast to the attorney-client privilege, “a party asserting work-product immunity is not required to prove non-waiver”
- party asserting waiver of work-product immunity, rather than the party asserting the work-product protection, should have the burden to establish waiver
- “It is well settled that the party seeking a protective order has the burden to demonstrate good cause to support the protective order”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waxse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kannaday v. BallD. Kansas· 2013-04-03· cited 51×
- New Jersey v. Sprint Corp.D. Kansas· 2009-07-02· cited 46×
- Ecuadorian v. Chevron Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 43×
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureD. Wyoming· 2002-10-17· cited 30×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-27· cited 29×
- Garrigan v. BowenSupreme Court of Colorado· 2010-12-20· cited 25×
- United States Fire Insurance v. Bunge North America, Inc.D. Kansas· 2007-12-20· cited 25×
- In re Commercial Money Center, Inc., Equipment Lease LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2008-03-05· cited 25×
- Lindley v. Life Investors InsuranceN.D. Oklahoma· 2010-02-17· cited 25×
- Thomas v. Marina AssociatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-05-08· cited 22×
- Greene, Tweed of Delaware, Inc. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-05-03· cited 21×
- Gall Ex Rel. Gall v. JamisonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-04-08· cited 20×
- Ex Parte Meadowbrook Ins. Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2007-12-21· cited 18×
- Lewis v. UNUM Corp. Severance PlanD. Kansas· 2001-04-04· cited 17×
- RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY v. United States Army Corps of EngineersD. Kansas· 2001-09-06· cited 16×
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. JamesD. Maine· 2010-02-21· cited 13×
- Black & Veatch Corp. v. Aspen Insurance (UK) Ltd.D. Kansas· 2014-02-28· cited 13×
- Greene v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-05-11· cited 12×
- Monsanto Co. v. Aventis Cropscience, N.V.E.D. Missouri· 2002-10-10· cited 12×
- Disidore v. Mail Contractors of America, Inc.D. Kansas· 2000-08-18· cited 11×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 857×
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 811×
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 665×
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court· 1946-01-02· cited 481×
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Tenth Circuit· 1998-02-13· cited 241×
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Third Circuit· 1984-06-28· cited 131×
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankTenth Circuit· 1985-02-06· cited 108×
- Karn v. RandN.D. Indiana· 1996-09-26· cited 60×
- B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-01-29· cited 48×
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.N.D. California· 1991-10-28· cited 46×
- Mackey v. IBP, Inc.D. Kansas· 1996-06-07· cited 45×
- Windsor v. MartindaleD. Colorado· 1997-09-22· cited 45×
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.D. Kansas· 1991-02-14· cited 39×
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Midland Bancor, Inc.D. Kansas· 1994-12-23· cited 39×
- State v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1984-12-14· cited 32×
- Musselman v. PhillipsD. Maryland· 1997-10-10· cited 32×
- Sentry Insurance v. ShiversD. Kansas· 1996-01-05· cited 31×
- All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionD. Kansas· 1993-12-16· cited 26×
- United States v. City of TorranceC.D. California· 1995-07-25· cited 26×
- Lamonds v. General Motors Corp.W.D. Virginia· 1998-07-02· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.