Skip to main content
D. Kansas· 3/6/2000

Johnson v. Gmeinder

Citations

  • 191 F.R.D. 638
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2931
  • 2000 WL 272347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Party asserting waiver of work-product immunity, rather than the party asserting the work-product protection, should have the burden to establish waiver.
  • in contrast to the attorney- client privilege, “a party asserting work-product immunity is not required to prove non-waiver”
  • in contrast to the attorney- client privilege, “a party asserting work-product immunity is not required to prove non-waiver”
  • in contrast to the attorney-client privilege, “a party asserting work-product immunity is not required to prove non-waiver”
  • party asserting waiver of work-product immunity, rather than the party asserting the work-product protection, should have the burden to establish waiver
  • “It is well settled that the party seeking a protective order has the burden to demonstrate good cause to support the protective order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waxse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.