Skip to main content

Johnson v. Davis

Citations

  • 198 Ariz. 599
  • 12 P.3d 1203
  • 334 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27
  • 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting courts interpret statutes to avoid rendering language “surplusage, . . . void, inert, redundant, or trivial,” or 9 GRUNWALD, et al. v. SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE, et al. Opinion of the Court causing “an absurd result”
  • when interpreting a statute, “we presume that the legislature did not intend an absurd result and our construction must avoid such a consequence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garbarino, Lankford, Timmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.