Johnson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a jury could reasonably determine that a pellet or BB gun was a deadly weapon (i.e. a type of weapon from which a shot could cause death or serious physical injury) in light of history of serious physical injuries caused by BB or pellet guns.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 19×
• Probus v. Commonwealth
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Beck v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
• Keeble v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 1,048×
• Houston v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 105×
• Wilburn v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 86×
• Skaggs v. Assad, by and Through Assad
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1986-07-03· cited 49×
• Thacker v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 28×
• State v. Dallen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1990-03-21· cited 26×
• Saylor v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-09-23· cited 25×
• State v. Seifert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-06-24· cited 21×
• Holbrook v. Knopf
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 20×
• Ware v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-06-30· cited 10×