State v. Dallen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the State presented sufficient evidence to permit the jury to find a BB gun was a dangerous weapon
• concluding a CO2-powered BB that shot pellets with enough velocity to pierce skin and cause bleeding was a “dangerous weapon”
• holding a firearm that shoots either BBs or pellets constitutes a dangerous weapon
• finding sufficient evidence was presented for jury to conclude a BB gun was a dangerous weapon
• noting that while a motion in arrest of judgment may be filed after a verdict of guilty, the motion in usually made to challenge the adequacy of a guilty plea and may not be used to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence
• “[R]eview of the sufficiency of the evidence is applicable ... to the motion for a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).