Johnson v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the court is “ordinarily” reluctant to supplant the partition court’s judgment because it possesses a wide “discretion”
• “Ordinarily where there is as wide a discretion reposed in a trial court as is reposed in it in partition actions we are reluctant to interpose our judgment for that of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chesmore v. Chesmore
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1971-04-20· cited 49×
• In re Estate of Einsel
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-06-10· cited 37×
• Gillet v. Powell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1953-03-07· cited 15×
• Renensland v. Ellenberger
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-11-18· cited 12×
• Jardon v. Price
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1947-06-07· cited 11×
• Wharton v. Zenger
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1947-11-08· cited 11×
• Knutson v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1950-05-06· cited 9×
• Home-Stake Production Co. v. Tri-State Pipe Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-06-11· cited 5×
• Browne v. Loriaux
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1961-12-09· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sawin v. Osborn
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1912-10-12· cited 50×
• Fry v. Dewees
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1940-03-09· cited 41×
• Deeds v. Deeds
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1921-04-09· cited 22×
• State v. Foren
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1908-10-10· cited 17×